Exposing Muslim Fanatics©2010 drkate Take a look at how David Horowitz handles this apologist for muslim extremism. David Horowitz Chilling Exchange With Muslim Student |
|
Comments: Exposing Muslim "Fanatics" denialator | 12.02.2010
Relative to "political" views embraced by people of Christian, Jewish, and Muslim "religions" in these videos, key components may be identified in the debates between ideologies, which are cleverly concealed in these dialogues. For clarification, it should be noted here that one who is less than fully educated in the history of Mohammedan Islam, should be made aware of the fact that all religions and gods are not equal, and one whose moral principles are rooted in good will and Biblical doctrine is at a disadvantage to one whose values are rooted in diabolical barbarism and hatred, due to the lack of moral integrity, and overwhelming intellectual dishonesty. One key element regarding debates over religious freedom, over which Muslim apologists argue and attempt to deceive the less informed majority, is the lack of intellectual honesty. The practice of "taqiyya" as defined in Koran and Hadith, is doctrinally embraced in Mohammedan, Islamic ideology, and typically used as an effective tool for achieving ultimate goals to gain domination and control over all other religions and cultures. This technique, universally applied in such debates, may also be defined as "Hegelian Dialectic", wherein questions are answered with disingenuous questions, and constant interruptions are employed to flummox and frustrate opponents. This technique is perfected in Islamic supremacist culture, embraced and encouraged as an ethical option for ALL Muslims, whether identified as a moderates or extremists. Additionally, discussions over "political" views, as alluded to by proponents of Islamism, involve the same processes of deception and intellectual dishonesty. Fundamental Islamism is based on Mohammedan doctrine, the history of which typifies more than religion, by classic definition, and comprises its basic ideology perpetuated by an ethos of violence, terrorism, and other destructive behaviors. Proponents of Islamism always resort to these methods to dominate and subjugate all other religions, classify them as illegitimate, and label their adherents as infidels or apostates from the supremacist Muslim ideology. Justification for this behavior is contrived from blind devotion to the supreme examples and lifestyle of Mohammed, the false prophet. All opposing viewpoints are declared to be inimical and strongly condemned. What Muslims refer to as their god (Allah), cannot be the same God of Christians and Jews. In fact the following verses taken from the sacred text are incoherent, and make no sense.
In a civilized society, the politically correct approach to dialogue on this topic would exclude any direct condemnation, however it should be noted that denial, appeasement and submission will do nothing to thwart the forces of evil, and inevitable decline of Western culture, the result of which is the ultimate loss of liberty and freedom, may not be unlikely. Freedom and Islamism cannot peacefully coexist in any civilized society. Let these salient facts be submitted to a candid world, before it's too late.
Practicing silence where protest is indicated is the defining attribute of cowardice. |